The overall message of the book Half the Sky can be described as understanding how women are oppressed around the world. Every corner of the Earth has some form of oppression and a large portion of that is directed at women. While every nation has a varying degree to which this oppression comes to fruition, it is important to note that any oppression or disparity is not acceptable. Even in America there is clearly still a disparity in the way we approach women’s issues as well as their role in the work place. It is still common that women are unable to advance past certain points in their career and are often paid less for the same work. Furthermore even the way we approach women’s products the sheer fact that they are not included under the protection of some insurance plans is incredulous.
I think one of the stories of that really impacts me is Hillary Clinton’s. Personally I have a connection to Hillary as she was my Aunt’s employer for an extended period of time, but furthermore she was one of the first women to ever have a chance to take the presidency. She was the first women to be the democrat’s presidential candidate, and once that was the case immediately the misogyny began. Here we have an extremely qualified, intelligent, and successful woman who had dedicated her entire life to this country through the means of being a public servant and doing things in the name of woman and other poorly represented communities. Yet when brought to the eye of the public in what has been called on e of the dirtiest campaigns of all time often Hillary was subjected to stereotyping and treatment based on her gender. I believe that one of the harshest examples of this was the fact that often the ridicule that she was given was not for mistakes that she had made throughout her career but rather that of her husband. I remember distinctly a moment when at the time presidential candidate Trump, now acting president, came after her relationship with her husband and his actions. This is something that would never be brought to the attention of a man and his wife’s actions and in fact is amazing that this statement even had any traction. A debate is supposed to be about discussing the important topics that the people of this nation want to know. Yet we were forced to witness the petty misogynistic comments simply because of the gender of one of the candidates.
While currently I study Computer Information Systems and Finance, it is my goal to eventually study economic policy and decision making so that I can make an impact in the political sphere locally as well as globally. One of my main focuses is the economic disparity between men and women. One of the largest arguments in favor of the disparity between men and women has historically been that women are more likely to get pregnant and leave work either for maternity leave or permanently. This added risk is often the reason or excuse for the gap in pay even if the work is the same. Objectively this makes sense from a business perspective, yet morally this is an injustice and can be solved by simple economic policy that is active in other developed nations. The concept of mandatory paternity and maternity leave is enforced on companies, which eliminates this risk by leveling the playing field. If both the mother and father are required to take this leave then the only disparity between a man and a woman should be their education and work performance. This is an economic tool that should allow for the gap to be closed further. Furthermore paternity leave shows that it is extremely helpful in a child’s development as well as aides in decreasing stress on a relationship and allows for happier individuals. This is good for the nation as well as improves productivity at work, because it allows for a greater work-life balance reducing stress and improving effectiveness.